The 23XI Racing and Entrance Row Motorsports v NASCAR antitrust lawsuit trial started in earnest on Monday and included jury choice, opening statements by each events and the partial testimony of the primary witness.
Denny Hamlin.
Between the partial testimony of the co-owner of 23XI, which was carried out by Jeanifer Parsigian, a companion at Winston & Strawn, and the opening assertion delivered by lead legal professional Jeffrey Kessler — the technique for the Plaintiffs got here into focus.
23XI, FRM argument
Kessler mentioned the jury might be proven proof of an anti-competitive technique orchestrated by NASCAR CEO Jim France over the subsequent two weeks. That proof, he argued, will come within the type of emails and textual content messages from lieutenant-executives Steve Phelps, Steve O’Donnell and Scott Prime illustrating an consciousness of unfairness in the direction of the groups whereas negotiating constitution extensions.
An instance of this was launched over the summer time within the type of a textual content message change the place Phelps mentioned the supply gave the groups ‘zero wins’ and that O’Donnell characterised it as a ‘fuck the groups’ supply that might take NASCAR again to its ‘tiny southern roots, the tiny sport of 1996.’
The under is a unfastened paraphrase within the absence of recorded audio:
‘The opposite three executives all knew that NASCAR operates beneath Jim France, and the household is the board (of administrators) and the board is NASCAR, so the board is Jim France, however the three executives reporting to him knew what Jim was doing to the groups,’ Kessler argued.
The lead legal professional added that NASCAR in the end took that deal, one his lieutenants argued was a ‘unhealthy deal’ and in the end resulted in what has been characterised by a number of groups as a ‘take it or depart it’ last supply in September 2024.
“Signal it by midnight or lose your charters,” Kessler mentioned, making his level. “That’s monopoly energy. That’s monopoly harm.”
Kessler mentioned the groups needed everlasting charters and didn’t get them. Kessler mentioned the groups needed $20 million per automobile and received $12.5 million. He additionally mentioned the groups requested for veto energy on competitors adjustments, which weren’t solely refused but in addition misplaced the ‘three strikes’ provision within the earlier constitution settlement that gave groups a level of veto capacity.
Relating to constitution permanency, Kessler likened the idea of shopping for a home versus renting a home in {that a} leased house might be taken away on the finish of the contract. Kessler mentioned groups need to completely personal their figurative home in order that they might extract extra enterprise worth from it.
Additional, doing so, he argued would price NASCAR ‘completely nothing’ however the Sanctioning Physique has not conceded that place.
In explaining to the jury what a monopsony is, Kessler likened it to any one in all them eager to apply as a nurse.
“If there is just one hospital, and also you need to be a nurse, you both take no matter they pay you otherwise you’re not going to be a nurse,” Kessler mentioned.
Kessler mentioned there have been three overarching factors to show the argument:
- NASCAR tied up all of the tracks with provisions that didn’t enable them to schedule competitor divisions with out approval from the Sanctioning Physique
- NASCAR restricted groups, that in case you race within the Cup Collection, you may’t race in a competitor division with out approval from the Sanctioning Physique
- NASCAR carried out the single-source provided NextGen automobile and guarded its Mental Property from being utilized by groups exterior of NASCAR with out permission whereas additionally controlling the prices via the acquisition of these components
In wrapping up his opening statements, Kessler once more went again to the conviction that Jim France used NASCAR’s monopsony standing to depress the incomes of groups competing within the Cup Collection. He mentioned they’ve knowledgeable testimony that exhibits groups would get 45 p.c of NASCAR’s worth in a good market and that the likes of Phelps, O’Donnell and Prime knew it.
As an alternative, the quantity is what groups say is 39 p.c.
“What the proof goes to point out is that (Jim) France ran this for his household on the expense of the groups,” Kessler mentioned.
Kessler additionally made some numerical arguments over financials. He mentioned a NASCAR valuation from Goldman Sachs had the Sanctioning Physique value $5 billion. He identified that NASCAR made $400 million the previous three years.
These had been only for context across the narrative concerning the plight of the groups total.
NASCAR argument
NASCAR legal professional John E. Stephenson offered the opening assertion for the Sanctioning Physique with the trial legal professional making his first look in court docket for this case with Chris Yates entrance and middle over the previous 15 months.
Stephenson’s argument was constant from what NASCAR has articulated over the summer time. He framed 23XI and Entrance Row as successfully attacking the constitution system, one which NASCAR has honored with each phrase and ‘each cent’ as agreed upon every time since 2016.
He often alluded to 23XI and Entrance Row as having not made any antitrust claims concerning the constitution system till after the extension deadline and after they issued the ultimate supply in September 2024.
“Actually none of this stuff had been raised to NASCAR till the lawsuit was filed,” Stephenson mentioned. “From 2016 to 2024, none of it was introduced up.”
Stephenson pointed to a letter from 23XI on September 6 that defined why they weren’t signing the settlement and that it made no point out of anticompetitive habits. He mentioned the identical of communications with Entrance Row.
As an alternative, the NASCAR place is that 23XI possible all the time supposed to deliver a lawsuit if they might not safe the monetary phrases it sought from the Sanctioning Physique. “A lawsuit is our best leverage,” Stephenson mentioned of a Curtis Polk (23XI co-owner) e-mail produced in discovery. He additionally used a frequent NASCAR speaking level — that 23XI and Entrance Row proceed to interact in ‘negotiation via litigation.’
That’s what NASCAR says 23XI and Entrance Row are doing — suing the Sanctioning Physique solely within the pursuit of higher phrases and never with some altruistic pursuit of righting an antitrust incorrect.
Stephenson pointed to a different Polk e-mail that mentioned of a proposed assembly with NASCAR that ‘I hope they don’t come as a result of it’s going to construct our file,’ with the lawyer arguing that 23XI wasn’t negotiating in good religion.
He mentioned that non-public Polk emails from 2023 that expressed ‘admiration’ for the France household’s enterprise acumen and made no reference to anticompetitive habits.
The NASCAR place continues to be, and it was made by Stephenson to the jury for the primary time, that if the charters had been such a byproduct of anticompetitive habits and a ‘unhealthy deal’ then why did 23XI maintain shopping for them?
In responding to 23XI and Entrance Row’s opening assertion concerning the non-compete clause that groups need to conform to to be able to compete in Cup, Stephenson mentioned it’s no completely different than the non-compete clause that drivers signal with groups.
As for the supply for groups to not compete towards NASCAR, Stephenson mentioned that was a trade-off the Sanctioning Physique needed from groups in change for better assured income.
“Be all in on NASCAR Inventory Automotive racing, is what that claims,” Stephenson argued. “You’re getting assured cash. They agreed to it. They by no means made claims towards it till submitting their lawsuit.”
About 23XI and Entrance Row’s declare that NASCAR’s merger with sister-company Worldwide Speedway Company was an anti-competitive measure to safe tracks and keep their monopsony, Stephenson mentioned it was about ‘schedule flexibility’ and ‘innovation’ as a result of NASCAR wanted to take dangers for occasions like Downtown Chicago and Downtown Los Angeles — regardless of proudly owning close by racetracks.
Making these selections, or selections that resulted in a loss had been issues NASCAR or ISC couldn’t do as a publicly traded entity.
Stephenson repeatedly requested ‘why are we right here,’ and pointed to Polk as having a pre-meditated plan to deliver NASCAR to trial if unable to safe the constitution phrases 23XI and Entrance Row sought.
Hamlin testimony
The day ended with 40 minutes of testimony from Hamlin. These had been pleasant questions from his personal authorized crew and he might be cross-examined sooner or later early on Tuesday morning as soon as Parsigian concludes her questions.
The day started with Choose Kenneth D. Bell ruling on a NASCAR movement that sought to have solely one of many three 23XI house owners within the court docket room to listen to all testimony. Bell was ‘reluctant’ to grant that movement, however not eager to danger a re-trial on technical grounds, he dominated in NASCAR’s favor.
That meant 23XI needed to designate that sole consultant, which was Jordan, however since Hamlin is the primary witness, he’ll be capable to sit on the bench for the remainder of the trial as soon as he’s achieved.
Polk can be part of them upon concluding his time on the stand, at any time when that comes.
Parsigian opened the road of questioning with the fundamentals.
Parsigian: “Did you graduate?”
Hamlin: “They gave me a diploma.”
Parsigian: “How did your most up-to-date season go?”
Hamlin:“Can I plead the fifth?”
Parsigian: “I do not suppose anybody is prosecuting you.”
Hamlin: “I used to be main the championship race with three to go. The warning got here out. I misplaced.”
There gave the impression to be a technique of mentioning that groups often compete with NASCAR for sponsorships as a result of Hamlin introduced it up 3 times beneath questioning from his personal legal professional.
For instance, what allowed 23XI to buy the Germain Racing crew constitution in 2021?
“They misplaced their sponsorship (GEICO) to NASCAR and went out of enterprise.”
What are Hamlin’s obligations at 23XI as a co-owner? It’s competitors and sponsorship, calling himself a ‘skilled fundraiser’ however once more introduced up that this implies often competing with NASCAR.
Why did 23XI spend $35 million to construct its state-of-the-art ‘Airspeed’ race store? Hamlin mentioned it was their greatest foot ahead to safe further sponsorship and rent one of the best workers available on the market.
However once more, he mentioned he has to compete with NASCAR when a possible sponsor expresses curiosity in becoming a member of the game.
“First, I’ve to fend off the collection,” Hamlin mentioned. “If a brand new sponsor need to are available in, NASCAR will go after them. I’ve to combat them. I’ve to combat different groups for them. I’ve to combat them for workers.”
Hamlin additionally received emotional when requested how he received began in racing and made it to NASCAR. He introduced up the contributions from his dad and mom, particularly his dad, who’s now publicly recognized to be in fading well being.
He mentioned the associated fee to area a Cup automobile, simply to get it on the monitor is $20 million, and that the present constitution settlement covers $12.5 million of that. The remaining must be coated by sponsorship.
Which, Hamlin concedes, that having Jordan as a co-owner is why they’ll flip earnings the place different groups can’t. It’s what made Jordan interesting as a possible co-owner for the crew he all the time needed to personal in his post-driving days.
Parsigian requested Hamlin if he felt the constitution settlement is truthful and he introduced up that 11 of the unique 19 constitution groups from 2016 have closed.
“If the phrases had been truthful, they would not have gone out of enterprise,” Hamlin mentioned. “Just one facet goes out of enterprise.”
Hamlin mentioned 23XI earnings often fluctuate for causes NASCAR controls — like mid-season guidelines updates which may generally price $1.5 million per automobile and worldwide races just like the one held in Mexico Metropolis this previous season.
“Schedule, automobile adjustments, rule adjustments — all these issues instantly have an effect on our backside line,” mentioned Hamlin.
Anecdotally, Hamlin additionally revealed that 23XI Racing pays Joe Gibbs Racing $2.66 million per automobile a season for an alliance payment since JGR is the first Toyota group. He was requested why his crew has simply 140 workers in comparison with the five hundred of a crew like JGR.
Hamlin additionally mentioned his enterprise companions ask him to run 23XI as lean as potential.
It was at this level that the clock struck 5 p.m. and Choose Bell has indicated that he desires to finish every day round this time and no later than 5:15 p.m. with every day beginning at 9:00 a.m.
Jury choice and witness record
At the present time opened with jury choice and the revelation of potential witnesses on both sides as effectively.
NASCAR: Jim France, Lesa France Kennedy, Ben Kennedy, Brian Herbst, Steve O’Donnell, Steve Phelps, Scott Prime, Tim Clark, Greg Motto, John Probst and Ron Drager.
Groups: Richard Childress, Rick Hendrick, Roger Penske, Heather Gibbs, Cal Wells III, Steve Newmark, Rob Kauffman and Jonathan Marshall.
It took somewhat over two hours to get to the six-man, three-woman jury. Bell, Kessler and Stephenson every took time with the potential jurors earlier than touchdown on the ultimate 9.
One juror candidate was dismissed for working at Hendrick Automotive Group and one other was dismissed for figuring out an excellent deal about NASCAR and the events concerned. They had been all requested, amongst different questions, in the event that they had been accustomed to Michael Jordan and if they’d robust opinions about by some means.
One candidate mentioned ‘sure.’ Choose Bell requested ‘so you will have emotions, and do not inform me what they’re, about Michael Jordan that might stop you from being truthful or neutral?” The candidate mentioned ‘sure.
That candidate was dismissed, and on his manner out the door, made a fist pump gesture on the legendary sportsman and so they shared amusing. This elicited laughter from all the courtroom and Choose Bell mentioned he appreciated the honesty.
One other potential juror had an analogous change with Choose Bell and mentioned ‘I like Mike,’ to get dismissed from serving.
One other candidate was dismissed as a result of he could not hear the decide, and Choose Bell tersely mentioned the person ought to think about taking good care of his listening to assist.
One potential juror joked on his questionnaire final week that his passion was ‘heavy consuming’ and wanted to defend it as not an impairment to serving. He ended up being one of many last 9.
The primary order of enterprise on Monday morning was Choose Bell scolding each events’ attorneys over their latest ‘confrontational’ method and prevented them from utilizing reveals of their opening statements.
Bell mentioned that he nervous each events had been ready to make use of disallowed reveals of their statements.
“If we might be much less confrontational about it subsequent time, possibly you’ll get to do what you need to do.”
We would like your opinion!
What would you wish to see on Motorsport.com?
Take our 5 minute survey.
– The Motorsport.com Crew
