Indian cricket legend Sunil Gavaskar supplied applicable statements to the previous England captain Nasser Hussain, who criticized India and the Worldwide Cricket Council (ICC) concerning the heated moments with Bangladesh. Gavaskar gave Hussain a mild reminder of what the England cricket workforce did just a few years in the past.
Gavaskar, in his column for Sportstar, addressed England for a number of causes. The cricket nice reckoned with the large expertise of Vaibhav Sooryavanshi and took a dig at England as nicely.
Sunil Gavaskar praised Vaibhav Sooryavanshi
Fourteen-year-old top-order batter Vaibhav Sooryavanshi registered a blistering 175 off 80 balls, the best particular person rating in a U19 World Cup ultimate, as India piled up 411 and went on to reclaim the title with a commanding 100-run win. Behind India U-19’s win within the summit conflict, there is no such thing as a doubt that the younger prodigy performed the primary position.
Your day by day dose of cricket!
“Within the just-concluded ultimate of the ICC Beneath-19 World Cup, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi smashed 175 off solely 80 balls towards England and single-handedly took the sport away from his opponents. To England’s credit score, they responded nicely and likewise acquired to 311 in reply to the Indian colts’ 411,” Gavaskar wrote in his column.
Nasser Hussain put a finger on India and ICC
However the focus of Gavaskar’s column is his views on Nasser Hussain’s feedback on the BCCI-Bangladesh standoff. The previous England cricket believed that if it have been Staff India rather than Bangladesh, then the ICC may not have the ability to take the ultimate name so swiftly. As Bangladesh didn’t wish to journey in India to play their T20 World Cup 2026 match, ICC eliminated the Bangladesh cricket workforce from the match.
“If India, a month earlier than a match, mentioned, ‘Our authorities doesn’t need us to play in a rustic for a World Cup,’ would the ICC have been so agency and mentioned, ‘You already know the principles, unhealthy luck, we’re knocking you out?'” Hussain raised the query throughout a Sky Sports activities Cricket Podcast.
“The one factor all sides ask for is consistency. Bangladesh, Pakistan, and India have to be handled the identical. Sure, India followers might say, ‘Cry extra, we have now the cash!’ However with energy comes accountability,” he additional added.
Gavaskar shut the previous England captain’s mouth
In reply, Gavaskar talked about a 2003 World Cup incident when the England cricket workforce refused to journey to Zimbabwe not due to safety issues however due to political causes. Then, ICC authorized the England cricket workforce’s plea.
“Within the 2003 World Cup, England refused to play in Zimbabwe, maybe as a result of they didn’t just like the face of the then-President Robert Mugabe saying his insurance policies. There was no safety risk, but they forfeited their factors. Did the ICC do something? No, as a result of at that stage, the English and Australian boards dominated the roost, and the others didn’t wish to upset them,” Sunil Gavaskar wrote.
Learn Extra: Mohsin Naqvi cries about Asia Cup row in entrance of ICC; shock India-Pakistan-Bangladesh Tri-series demand revealed
