He was younger and vibrant, the spokesman for a brand new technology. However when he was gunned down, there was some cheering amid the widespread shock.
I’m not speaking about Charlie Kirk, who was murdered on a Utah faculty campus final week; I’m speaking about John F. Kennedy. However the truth that comparable phrases can be utilized to explain each political assassinations underscores this level:
Resorting to violence to additional political targets will not be a partisan illness. It by no means has been, and it definitely isn’t in the present day.
Sadly, not everyone understands that, notably the president of the USA, who noticed Kirk’s homicide as a cause responsible his opponents on the left.
However simply months earlier than Kirk was gunned down, outstanding Minnesota Democrat Melissa Hortman, her husband and canine had been murdered of their suburban Minneapolis space dwelling.
And earlier than a progressive activist shot Louisiana Republican Rep. Steve Scalise on a northern Virginia baseball observe area in 2017, a person with misogynist views shot Arizona Democratic Rep. Gabby Giffords at a Tucson constituent assembly.
Earlier, two Kennedys, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X had been murdered by political opponents, whereas two different Democratic presidents — Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman — and three Republicans — Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump — narrowly escaped assassination makes an attempt.
In an age the place too many political rivals are routinely portrayed as enemies, many American politicians in each events perceive what ought to change.
“We are able to return violence with violence; we will return hate with hate. That’s the issue with political violence. It metastasizes,” Utah’s Republican Gov. Spencer Cox mentioned. “We are able to all the time level the determine on the different aspect. Sooner or later, we’ve got to seek out an off ramp, or else it’s going to get a lot worse.”
“We should stand collectively in rejecting violence, decreasing the temperature of our politics and recommitting ourselves to the values of civility, respect, and group that American democracy requires,” mentioned Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs of Kirk’s dwelling state of Arizona.
However not President Donald Trump. Talking from the Oval Workplace, he blamed his — and Kirk’s — political opponents for this killing and the proliferation of violence normally.
“For years, these on the novel left have in contrast fantastic Individuals like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals,” mentioned Trump, who routinely derided 2024 opponent Kamala Harris as a “radical left lunatic.” “This type of rhetoric is instantly accountable for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our nation in the present day, and it should cease proper now,” he added.
On Fox Information’ “Fox and Buddies” final Friday, Trump doubled down, after host Ainsley Earhart requested: “How can we repair this nation? How can we come again collectively?”
“I’ll let you know one thing that’s going to get me in hassle, however I couldn’t care much less,” he replied.
“The radicals on the precise oftentimes are radical as a result of they don’t wish to see crime. They don’t wish to see crime. Frightened concerning the border. They’re saying, ‘We don’t need these individuals coming in. We don’t need you burning our buying facilities. We don’t need you capturing our individuals in the course of the road,’” Trump mentioned.
“The radicals on the left are the issue,” he continued, “they usually’re vicious they usually’re horrible they usually’re politically savvy, though they need males in ladies’s sports activities, they need transgender for everybody, they need open borders.”
In different phrases: radicals on the precise search helpful targets, which justifies no matter they do; radicals on the left search dangerous targets, which doesn’t.
Within the six a long time I’ve coated American politics, I can’t consider a single different president who would have reacted that manner. Whether or not liberal or conservative, they might all have responded to Kirk’s killing with phrases of unity and reassurance.
“Reasonably than pointing fingers or assigning blame, let’s use this event to increase our ethical imaginations, to hear to one another extra rigorously, to sharpen our instincts for empathy and remind ourselves of all of the ways in which our hopes and desires are certain collectively,” former President Barack Obama mentioned after Giffords’ capturing.
“There’s no place for this sort of violence in America,” former President Joe Biden mentioned, after a gunman shot and wounded Trump at a 2024 Pennsylvania political rally. “We should unite as one nation to sentence it.”
However that’s not how Trump sees issues.
He was undoubtedly influenced by the truth that he was the goal of an murderer’s bullet, and since Kirk was not solely an essential ally however near him and his household.
However that doesn’t justify his unequal reactions to the 2 most up-to-date political assassinations — of an ally and a Democratic opponent.
For Kirk, Trump made an Oval Workplace speech, lowered flags to half-mast, introduced he would award Kirk posthumously the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and mentioned he’d attend Sunday’s Arizona funeral.
When Hortman and her husband had been murdered, he took no official discover, stating with out mentioning her title on Fact Social there was “a horrible capturing … in Minnesota, which seems to be a focused assault in opposition to State Lawmakers” and including, “Such horrific violence is not going to be tolerated in the USA of America.”
And in speaking about political violence after Kirk’s homicide, Trump talked about neither Hortman’s killing nor the hearth an arsonist set on the Pennsylvania governor’s residence whereas Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro and his household slept inside.
As an alternative, he appears undeterred from utilizing Kirk’s killing for political ends.
Whereas he’d “wish to see it (the nation) heal,” he informed NBC Information in a telephone interview, “We’re coping with a radical left group of lunatics, they usually don’t play truthful they usually by no means did.”
Carl P. Leubsdorf is a columnist for the Dallas Morning Information.
You possibly can ship letters to the editor to letters@pressdemocrat.com.
