Why the F1 Belgian GP begin was delayed for thus lengthy

Heavy rain within the morning triggered flashbacks of 2021 for a lot of within the Spa-Francorchamps paddock. Again then, unrelenting rain within the Ardennes resulted in a “race” of simply two laps behind the security automobile. 4 years on, a repeat of that situation was prevented – however the race was removed from a thriller, regardless of promising elements like a legendary circuit, an attention-grabbing beginning grid, and moist situations. The late begin eliminated a lot of the thrill, turning a possible fashionable wet-weather traditional right into a largely dry race.

After the race, opinions within the paddock have been divided. Carlos Sainz had “respect” for race management, including that at a monitor like Spa, particularly contemplating its current historical past, “higher protected than sorry” needs to be the rule. Ferrari crew boss Frederic Vasseur added it’s simple to guage in hindsight, noting that groups would’ve been the primary to slam race management if an earlier begin had gone flawed.

Alternatively, Crimson Bull expressed shock on the prolonged delay. Helmut Marko admitted Crimson Bull had chosen the flawed set-up for the precise situations however prompt that “with the fitting race director,” the set-up would have been the fitting one. Max Verstappen wasn’t impressed by the race director’s calls both: “If you happen to can’t see correctly, you possibly can at all times elevate.”

Poor visibility, although Verstappen needed to race instantly

In actuality, the delay was the results of a number of components and step-by-step selections, Autosport has discovered after the race. The FIA initially meant for the race to start out on schedule at 3pm native time, with a formation lap behind the security automobile as the usual protocol in such situations. Throughout this lap, race management listened to driver suggestions.

In line with the FIA, nearly all drivers stated visibility was nonetheless too poor to race at that time. Just one driver was prepared to go racing instantly: Verstappen. The Dutchman voiced his opinion over the radio that a few laps behind the security automobile would have been sufficient to clear many of the standing water on monitor. Alex Albon shared an identical view behind the wheel and stated it could be good to get some laps in earlier than extra rain would hit the monitor.

However based mostly on the suggestions of the vast majority of the drivers, a purple flag was proven. At first, the FIA thought-about restarting the race after a brief 10-minute pause. Nevertheless, the foundations require the race director to problem a “10 minutes warning” to groups forward of a restart. The FIA then observed extra rain was anticipated round that point, successfully ruling out a fast restart.

Why did not the three-hour race clock begin operating?

This additionally raised one other query: had the three-hour race clock began but? Even the groups weren’t aligned. McLaren informed Lando Norris in pitlane that it hadn’t, for the reason that race hadn’t formally begun. Haas crew boss Ayao Komatsu, nevertheless, interpreted it in a different way. The confusion is comprehensible. Article 5.4d of the sporting laws states: “If the formation lap for the race is began behind the security automobile, the utmost whole race time of three hours will start on the time the inexperienced lights on the beginning gantry are illuminated to sign the security automobile will depart the grid in accordance with Article 49.2.”

That is precisely what occurred at 3pm native time. Nevertheless, the FIA clarified that this part of the laws solely applies within the case of an precise race interruption, not in the course of the beginning process. This meant the race had not formally began, and parc ferme situations have been nonetheless in impact. Groups weren’t allowed to vary their set-ups in anticipation of drier situations.

It seemingly damage groups with a higher-downforce set-up, together with Crimson Bull, however crew boss Laurent Mekies later clarified that they wouldn’t have modified the set-up anyway, even when it had been allowed by the FIA. “When the formation lap was then suspended, you continue to count on to have a good bit of moist operating at that second. I do not suppose we’d have modified something, even when parc ferme was open, as a result of we have been anticipating to return on monitor a lot sooner than what we finally did.”

As soon as the race did begin, a number of components brought on the additional security automobile laps and a rolling begin name

In line with the FIA, the post-red flag rain lasted about half-hour. After that, officers waited a bit longer earlier than sending the medical automobile out on monitor at 4pm native time to assemble suggestions on the monitor situations. Alan van der Merwe reported again to race management that a number of sections nonetheless had vital standing water and advisable that marshals be given one other 10 minutes to clear the floor. This introduced the timeline to 4:10pm for the “10 minutes warning,” and automobiles leaving pitlane at 4:20pm. Notably, the FIA initially introduced “race shall be resumed,” which was later corrected, because the race had by no means formally began.

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Lando Norris, McLaren, Oscar Piastri, McLaren

Picture by: Andy Hone / LAT Photographs through Getty Photographs

As soon as the drivers have been again on monitor, the preliminary plan was to finish simply two laps behind the security automobile. Extra drivers – together with Lewis Hamilton – felt it was protected to go racing at this stage. Nevertheless, race management nonetheless deemed the spray on Kemmel Straight, notably the part after Raidillon, too dangerous. It’s a treacherous a part of the long-lasting monitor, the place visibility is a priority even in dry situations throughout incidents. Due to this fact, a further security automobile lap was added.

A fourth lap adopted, however this time for a unique motive: whether or not the race would start with a standing or rolling begin. Followers naturally hoped for a standing begin, and climate situations could have been ok for it, however the FIA needed to think about one other issue as properly: the beginning grid itself – particularly, the quantity of standing water and the imbalance between the drier and wetter sides. The drier facet had considerably higher grip, whereas the opposite facet nonetheless had puddles, creating an unfair benefit and a possible security concern for half the sphere.

Spa as soon as once more uncovered F1’s points within the moist

The outcomes have been a delay of over 90 minutes earlier than the inexperienced flag was proven, and Verstappen commenting: “This isn’t actually moist climate racing for me. I simply discover it a little bit of a disgrace for everybody. You’ll by no means see these traditional moist races anymore.”

Above all, the afternoon has as soon as once more highlighted F1’s present struggles within the moist. Most drivers nonetheless don’t love Pirelli’s full wets – with extra modifications anticipated for 2026 – however spray stays the largest problem. Mix that with Spa’s popularity, and also you get the cautious strategy seen on Sunday.

Some groups within the paddock view it as overly conservative, however from the FIA’s standpoint, security took absolute priority. Hanging the fitting stability between security and spectacle stays a tough process.